> **What were the issues with the roster under kuben?**
> With Jakub “kuben” Gurczyński, we had synergy problems between the coach and the captain, they couldn’t find a common language or vision of the game, which is why the coach was changed first. All I can say about Kuben is that he’s a good coach with lots of experience and his own vision. I have a similar vision of the game as Kuben, but sometimes the puzzle doesn’t work if only two or three people are involved in it.
It seems odd for sdy to say that gla1ve and kuben don’t have the same vision for the game, then go on to say that he actually views the game more like kuben instead of the IGL they decided to keep. It seems the puzzle will still be missing pieces, no? The next section he talks about how enkay J gave more control of the game to gla1ve, but I don’t quite see how that will solve the problem if the secondary caller still has a different vision.
1 Comment
> **What were the issues with the roster under kuben?**
> With Jakub “kuben” Gurczyński, we had synergy problems between the coach and the captain, they couldn’t find a common language or vision of the game, which is why the coach was changed first. All I can say about Kuben is that he’s a good coach with lots of experience and his own vision. I have a similar vision of the game as Kuben, but sometimes the puzzle doesn’t work if only two or three people are involved in it.
It seems odd for sdy to say that gla1ve and kuben don’t have the same vision for the game, then go on to say that he actually views the game more like kuben instead of the IGL they decided to keep. It seems the puzzle will still be missing pieces, no? The next section he talks about how enkay J gave more control of the game to gla1ve, but I don’t quite see how that will solve the problem if the secondary caller still has a different vision.
Good interview though, I enjoyed reading it