I always laugh when remember Huang telling about 8k gaming a couple years ago. But now 1080p still a problem apparently… 1080p is here since 2005, By the way
ApoyuS2en
In addition to that, games like farcry 4 and arkham knight still looks literally stunning on my 2k monitor and i can run them maxed out even with my rx580 8gb LOL
Blunt552
it’s sad because the games are literally shipping with the vaseline filter forced on players.
r/FuckTAA
i_eatkids2137
I have questions HOW a game like CoD mw2 from 2009 has such beautiful graphics and you don’t need such a strong PC but now modern games need strong RTX
tizzydizzy1
Bad game with bad development tend to do that. And now with those Ai shit, dev will become even more lazy to optimise their game
blyatbob
And there is not a single new game worth its salt
GradientOGames
I can’t believe AAA devs have standardized this, even more so due to unreal because of their shitty TAA, fancy runtime solutions, and people believing nanite is an optimisation (unlike what it really is, an over glorified automatic lod generator, which is still sub par against well optimised lods)
Lillyy25
Game graphics peaked 5/6 years ago. We dont need super high detail shadows we cant even see. Image clarity has also gone down the drain with taa, dlss and fsr
Illustrious-Run3591
Still yet to find a game I can’t play on high/ultra 1080p with a 3060. DLSS is awesome
joystickd
It’s funny I held that belief as I hadn’t played BF1 in a few years and remember it looking spectacular.
I fired it up last weekend and it definitely is showing its age now. Still looks great, don’t get me wrong, but I can certainly see where it looks a bit dated with ‘renewed’ eyes due to so much time away from it.
Still a hella fun game though. Don’t know why they stopped the Behemoths after it.
KittenDecomposer96
Yea, i first played BF1 on a 750 Ti at native 1080p with medium settings and i was getting very nice framerates.
A17012022
We made a rod for our own back when we buy nvidia because it has DLSS.
Devs know we’re mostly buying the card with the better upscaling tech, so they don’t optimise as well.
“Fuck it, everyone is buying the xx60/70/80 cards, DLSS will cover all sins”.
If AMD had the market share, devs wouldn’t be leveraging upscaling as much as they do (we can all agree that FSR is not as good as DLSS).
BidZealousideal3394
Mgs 5, Far cry 4, Arkham Knight, Bf1 all can be played with r9 270 without an issue.
TheTonchi53
The more powerful graphics cards we throw at the developers the less they feel like they have the need to optimize their games. If you need an equivalent of a 4070 ti to play some of the newer games at Max settings then you are not doing yourself a favor , On steam: 4070 ti is at 1,33 % 4090 is at 1.02 % 4080 is at 0.86 % 4080 super is at 0.29 % 4070 ti super is at 0.27% Rx 7900 xtx is at 0.39%
Rx 7900 gre and XT are not even listed but let’s give them combined an t 0.50%
That’s a total of less than 5% of users. Who are you making your games for ? Bring it down a notch, any game would profit of having better visuals and performance if more people can run them on Max settings . The effort they are putting in making the games look 5% better for the 5% of the player base they could put into making the game run and look better for 80% of the player base , just lower the ceiling a little. Shit games from 2018 look bloody great to this day .
Dreamo84
Yeah, but once we show you a still shot side by side… if you zoom into the background and squint… you can tell it’s better now. Would you rather have higher frame rates? Or slightly better still shots?
Mih0se
I could play Forza horizon 4 at 40 fps with ultra preset. On a 1050ti
Zetin24-55
Halo 4, that game looks better than it has any business looking for being 12 years old.
i_a_n_B
Detroit become human lore, ultra graphics on a 2060, a game from 2017, still better than some 2024 AAA games
demonsdencollective
I’m still impressed at how good Dirt 3 looks. Even more impressed that it runs great on even potatoes.
ilikemarblestoo
This is literally every generation of videogames forever.
23 Comments
I always laugh when remember Huang telling about 8k gaming a couple years ago. But now 1080p still a problem apparently… 1080p is here since 2005, By the way
In addition to that, games like farcry 4 and arkham knight still looks literally stunning on my 2k monitor and i can run them maxed out even with my rx580 8gb LOL
it’s sad because the games are literally shipping with the vaseline filter forced on players.
r/FuckTAA
I have questions HOW a game like CoD mw2 from 2009 has such beautiful graphics and you don’t need such a strong PC but now modern games need strong RTX
Bad game with bad development tend to do that. And now with those Ai shit, dev will become even more lazy to optimise their game
And there is not a single new game worth its salt
I can’t believe AAA devs have standardized this, even more so due to unreal because of their shitty TAA, fancy runtime solutions, and people believing nanite is an optimisation (unlike what it really is, an over glorified automatic lod generator, which is still sub par against well optimised lods)
Game graphics peaked 5/6 years ago. We dont need super high detail shadows we cant even see. Image clarity has also gone down the drain with taa, dlss and fsr
Still yet to find a game I can’t play on high/ultra 1080p with a 3060. DLSS is awesome
It’s funny I held that belief as I hadn’t played BF1 in a few years and remember it looking spectacular.
I fired it up last weekend and it definitely is showing its age now.
Still looks great, don’t get me wrong, but I can certainly see where it looks a bit dated with ‘renewed’ eyes due to so much time away from it.
Still a hella fun game though. Don’t know why they stopped the Behemoths after it.
Yea, i first played BF1 on a 750 Ti at native 1080p with medium settings and i was getting very nice framerates.
We made a rod for our own back when we buy nvidia because it has DLSS.
Devs know we’re mostly buying the card with the better upscaling tech, so they don’t optimise as well.
“Fuck it, everyone is buying the xx60/70/80 cards, DLSS will cover all sins”.
If AMD had the market share, devs wouldn’t be leveraging upscaling as much as they do (we can all agree that FSR is not as good as DLSS).
Mgs 5, Far cry 4, Arkham Knight, Bf1 all can be played with r9 270 without an issue.
The more powerful graphics cards we throw at the developers the less they feel like they have the need to optimize their games.
If you need an equivalent of a 4070 ti to play some of the newer games at Max settings then you are not doing yourself a favor ,
On steam:
4070 ti is at 1,33 %
4090 is at 1.02 %
4080 is at 0.86 %
4080 super is at 0.29 %
4070 ti super is at 0.27%
Rx 7900 xtx is at 0.39%
Rx 7900 gre and XT are not even listed but let’s give them combined an t 0.50%
That’s a total of less than 5% of users.
Who are you making your games for ?
Bring it down a notch, any game would profit of having better visuals and performance if more people can run them on Max settings .
The effort they are putting in making the games look 5% better for the 5% of the player base they could put into making the game run and look better for 80% of the player base , just lower the ceiling a little.
Shit games from 2018 look bloody great to this day .
Yeah, but once we show you a still shot side by side… if you zoom into the background and squint… you can tell it’s better now. Would you rather have higher frame rates? Or slightly better still shots?
I could play Forza horizon 4 at 40 fps with ultra preset. On a 1050ti
Halo 4, that game looks better than it has any business looking for being 12 years old.
Detroit become human lore, ultra graphics on a 2060, a game from 2017, still better than some 2024 AAA games
I’m still impressed at how good Dirt 3 looks. Even more impressed that it runs great on even potatoes.
This is literally every generation of videogames forever.
I love BF1
On dated hardware too(ps4,xbox1).
4070 for 78 fps qhd and 29fps 4k 🤡